The team got together one Saturday afternoon to develop our methodology for completing our team performance review. Some had never given or received one, outside of a classroom style peer review, luckily I had some experience in this area. We looked at various examples online and between that and chapter 9 in the Tucker book, we came up with a system that worked for us.
We broke down the most important aspects of high-performance according to our team, like how good we are at working in a team, if we were reliable, and if the quality of work we produced was on par. We gave each section a numerical ranking, which is exemplary of the graphic rating scale technique or profile rating sheet. We also required a textual response in each category to give more personal feedback. The method we used also falls under the category of peer appraisals and field review because of the different roles each group member has and because we are all peers, at least in the sense of schooling.
I thought the creation of the performance review was really helpful. It was great to get the feedback from my team and to give it as well. I think the insight to how the other members of my group viewed me made me want to try even harder and give more to make our experience as successful and enjoyable as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment